Lokpal - An Analysis

'Dharmo Rakshati Rakshitah:' - Righteousness protects those who uphold it. The Dharma of an individual is enshrined in the constitution. Thus, Law protects those who uphold it or conversely law punishes those who misuse it.

Corruption which has deep roots in the Indian society, needs an equally deep rooted solution. This solution must come from an awakened nationalism. For this, an environment of free thinking, productive argument and debate must be created. The onus lies with the various participants of polity like the media, civil society and the state. Is Lokpal an outcome of this churning process? Will this institution act as a detterent or will it be a cure to the chronic disease of corruption? How effective will it be if at all it sees the light of the day?

With the emergence of the middle class and the growth in technology, every govt. policy has come under the scrutiny of these educated people. The general awareness levels of the people has increased with an increase in literacy levels. With the boom in the IT and Telecom sectors, the distance between people has narrowed and connectivity has become faster than ever. World wide, the social networking sites have provided the much needed impetus to the people's movements against the corrupt govts. as seen in the West Asia and North Africa (WANA) region. In India too they played an important role in mobilising the diverse sections of the society, with a common cause, against the corruption.

Lokpal bill is one such outcome which awaits its materialisation. It has been 40 odd years since it was first introduced in the parliament. Anti corruption laws in India are truly flawed as they expect the accused to act against himself, which turns out to be a conflict of interest. Lokpal, is anologous to the ombudsmen system of the west. Its mandate is to register and investigate the charges of corruption levied against the govt. officials. But the govt. draft of the bill again makes it a puppet in their hands thus defeating the very purpose of the bill.

Govt. is accusing the civil society of using arm twisting techniques like staging dharnas to pressurise the govt. to pass the latter's version of the bill. In a democracy, peaceful dharnas are completely acceptable ways to voice people's opinions. Govt. though has a de jure authority over the final version of the bill, as the representatives of the people and to avoid the conflict the interest, should not the civil society and the people be given the chance to take the final call on the bill? Even the civil society must not hurry through this process. They must put forth all the pros and cons in front of the people and then take their valuable opinion through a proper referendum.

Though there are many contentious issues in the lokpal bill, two of them are glaring and important. One is about inclusion of PM within the ambit of lokpal and other is the protection given to the whistle blowers.

Presently PM is covered under the Prevention of Corruption Act 1988. With bringing that office under lokpal there can be a common body for investigation. Critics say that this would create instability in the system. But as they say, "You have nothing to fear, if you have nothing to hide".

Whistleblowers' protection as envisaged by the bill cannot be comprehensive with the extensive nexus between the criminals and the politicians. Will lokpal hire naxals and goondas as the threat would be from these groups on the other side? Police protection would be the last option when there is a politician on the other side. Protecting the identity of the individual is a better solution but it all would depend on how strong the system is.  

Prevention is better than cure. Lokpal with all its powers can only cure the existing disease and not prevent its future occurences. Preventive measures include abolishing Art 311 which gives security of tenure to the civil servants. This would keep them on their toes w.r.t their efficiency and honesty. Electoral reforms such as introducing 'none of the above' option in the list of contesting candidates. Though these reforms have their own setbacks, with a proper system in place, these are possible.

Finally, to hit the nail on its head, an attitudinal change must be brought among the people. No law or Act can be successful if the people are reluctant to change. This change is possible only through an education system integrated with moral values. It needs strong conviction and character to say 'No' to corruption. Thus it should come from source (moral principles) and not by force (law). This is the only permanent prevention and rest all are just temporary and superficial cures.

Securing Food for all

 Food is the basic need which drives the whole mankind. Every activity done on this earth is to fulfill the hunger of the individuals. India with its vast area under cultivation has been striving to feed its billion plus population. First with its break through in Green revolution and now with its focus on legal entitlement legislations. Securing food for all needs state interventions at various stages like production, procurement, storage and distribution.

At the production stage, the various govt. interventions are:

Rural credit: Farmers were given credit (upto 3.5 lakh crores this budget) to supplement their input costs on buying agri machinery, seeds, fertilizers (Nutrient Based Subsidy scheme). They were given 2% interest subvention on repayment of loans. The crop insurance scheme in the event of failure has neutralised the erratic monsoon conditions.But the recent farmer debts and suicides in vidarbha and other semi arid regions can be attributed to the extortions from local money lenders and crop failures due to lack of irrigation.

Land reforms - Though these were supposed to be helping the small and marginal farmers, it actually turned against them. With land ceiling laws, rich farmers could manipulate the sizes and threaten the landless labourers. But in states like west bengal, these reforms showed positive results with poor farmers getting their share of land.

Research activities - ICAR has done a commendable job in providing information related to various seeds, technologies, different farming techniques. Farmers can now avail such information through Kisan Call Centres (KCC). With ISRO's intervention through recently launched Resourcesat 2 in mapping the cropping areas and to be launched Megha Tropiques to monitor weather conditions for monsoons, farmers will be in a better position to predict the crop seasons. In contrast, the introduction of hybrid varieties have not augered well with the farmers, who recommend organic farming.

Even with such ups and downs, the production of grains for the year 2010-11 has crossed the estimated target of 225 MT of which 90 MT approx. each is rice and wheat.

At the procurement stage, the govt. is buying the grains at a particular Minimum Support Price (MSP). But according to the Alag committee and Swaminathan committee reports, the MSP for 12 major crops has always been less than the production costs. A nation whose 60 % population  is dependent on agriculture cannot be so callous in its attitude towards remunerating its farmers. These committees have recommended that the MSP must be announced before the sowing season and it should be production costs + 50 % so that farmer gets a considerable income to lead his life comfortably.  

Storage has been an area of concern recently with excess of food grains produced. Govt. is contemplating of bringing in FDI in multi brand retail to solve this problem. Recent govt. decision to export some of the food grains because of lack of storage facilities only speaks of its lack of fore sightedness. This is a problem which needs a modest local solution by investing in building more storage houses rather than resorting to FDI. The Narendra modi committee on food security recommended branching the FCI into 3 parts namely procurement, storage and distribution to make the job easier.

With 225 MT of production, India is comfortably poised to universalise its food security program, but the NAC recommendations and subsequent Rangarajan panel's comments on it speak otherwise. Distribution stage is the most important component of the whole chain as it is not enough to make available the food grains, but they should be accessible by the needy.

Refering to the recent famine in the Horn of Africa, UN defined Famine as that where at least 20 per cent of households face extreme food shortages with limited ability to cope, acute malnutrition in over 30 per cent of people, and two deaths per 10,000 people every day. Comparing these statistics with those of India, there is 17% of extreme food shortage, around 40% are under nourished and around 0.25 people die per 10000 per day. Thus India is almost at the brink of being declared as a Famine hit nation.

The NAC recommended that 75% of rural and 50% of urban poor would be covered under the food security bill. They will be categorised into priority and general groups. Each priority individual will be entitled to 7 kg of grains per month at Rs 2 per kg. It also speaks of mid day meals, child nutrition levels etc. They also recommended that in case govt. couldnt provide grains to the poor, they can avail direct cash transfers instead. But the recent survey by a group of institutes revealed the fact that people wanted grains and not money.

With amateur calculations, it could be easily found out that for 1200 million population and with total grains of 180 MT, the total availability per capita is 150 kg / person/ year. i.e each person can get around 12kgs of rice / wheat per month. 

Thus, universalisation of food security is not impractical as envisaged by the eminent economists and policy makers of this country.

Thus, it is the distribution mechanism which needs to be strengthened. There are two main mechanisms in this structural reforms which needs attention.

1. Pricing mechanism

2. Delivery mechanism

Pricing refers to the cost of the grains to be given to the people. As the proverb goes, 'There are no free lunches...' people must be made to pay some amount for the grains they are getting instead of giving it free of cost (to avoid misuse). But who will pay how much is a point of contention. It will bring BPL lines into picture which are again faulty. Total subsidisation or total marketisation would not be useful. Instead a middle path must be followed. Present BPL card holders should continue to get benefitted with their cards. Govt. must look out for new entrants from APL group and make necessary provisions. A constant upgradation of the records is a must. UID could be of immense help in this activity.

Delivery refers to the amount of foodgrains to be given at a time to the people. If a person is given all the 12kgs at a time, he /she might not have that much storage facility with them or they might misuse it. So, daily disbursals can be a solution. Men might sell these grains for liquor, so women can be given the entitlement for the household. A strong grievance redressal mechanism must be in place to check any leakages. Community participation in this mechanism is a tested and best option. Quality of grains is also a matter of importance. Therefore more no.of godowns in an area where people dont have storage facility and a good maintainance of them is a must.  

Emulating the Brazil example, India can also integrate various related schemes and these schemes will act as checks and balances on one another. For example, Food security, Education, Health can be linked. Thus, periodic health check ups by authorities will give a clear picture about the improvements in nutrition levels in the area where PDS is working. Enrollment of children of the household in the nearby schools can be made mandatory for the family to avail there share of food grains.

Thus, with increasing global prices and unstable economies in the world, self reliance is the best option to feed our people. With a proper policy in place and timely intervention, it is possible to make India self reliant in securing food for all its citizens.

Resourcing our Resources

Resources are those things which we can use for our development. They can be broadly classified as tapped and untapped resources. The difference lies in the availability of technology to access them.
Humans are the most versatile consumers of these resources. Therefore as the population grows exponentially even as the resources remain limited, per capita utilisation is bound to decrease in the future. India, as an emerging power must focus its policies on accessing these resources and utilising them judiciously for its exploding population.Thus it is not the weapons but the access to these shrinking resources which holds the key to the might of a country in the global arena.

Land is one of the most important and scarce resource today. India accounting for 2.4% of world's area supports nearly 17% of the world population. This is putting an enormous pressure on the land to meet the conflicting needs of the people. Cultivable land is acquired for housing purposes, forest dwellers' land is taken for industrial purposes  and so on. In this tug of war, the winner is always the wealthy and the powerful leaving the poor behind. Thus the govt. initiatives like Forest Rights Act 2006 act as a cushion for these poor.

The industrial growth is appreciated but not at the cost of the livelihoods of the traditional forest dwellers. For eg: in Odisha, beatle leaves cultivators earn 1.5 lakh/year, where as govt. compensation for acquiring there land for 30 years is jus 1.15 lakh. They are more well off with their traditional jobs than these industrial jobs. Bio fuels, which are showcased as the panacea for the global warming, are consuming many maize crops leaving behind many hungry and poor. It is just solving one problem by creating another.



Inter state water disputes are becoming complex especially in the southern states. Construction of dams, sharing of water, diversion of water are some of the issues in it. River linking is expected to solve this problem but there are concerns w.r.t flooding and drought. Reverse osmosis is one technology which if mastered can solve the drinking water problem as India has a long coastline of 7500 Km. Presently govt. has prioritised the usage of water as drinking, irrigation, navigation and industrial.



Food production in India crossed 225 Mn tonnes in 2010-11 but it hosts the most number of hungry people in the world. Universalisation of food security is a timely measure by the govt. but its implementation is a matter of concern and has a lot of scope for improvement. Another major problem in this sector is of storage and wastage. Govt. exports our grains to other countries just because we do not have enough storage facilities. This is a simple problem which requires a modest investment in construction of storage houses and not resorting to FDI.

Supply chain in the food cycle is an important component in providing food to the needy and giving a proper compensation for the producers. The solution lies in govt. taking initiatives to connect the farmer to the consumer by providing appropriate logistics like transport vehicles, VAS on their mobiles regarding market prices and so on. FDI in multi brand retail will bind the farmers to these MNCs on the producers' side and help only the well off consumers and not the lower middle class on the consumers' side. The way out can be cooperatives with strict monitoring and regulation. The problem of politicisation and inefficiency can be solved with growing technology and legislations like RTI.



'Energy security' is a cliched term used in almost all summits and negotiations in the world today. Its importance is unparallel for the economic growth of any country depends on its access to energy sources. Oil, petrol, Gas prices are driving all other commodity prices up and down. With the concerns of global warming rising, nations are looking for alternatives like solar, nuclear, biogas and so on.

Energy is one resource, which if harnessed well has no limitation. Renewable ones like solar, hydro, biogas, wind are simple and direct solutions but fall under the 'untapped' category. We have technologies but are presently not affordable. Improvisation can bring down the cost and make it accessible for millions. The deregulation of petrol and diesel prices recently sparked protests nation wide. But we have not yet learned the hard way of using these resources prudently.

 Even for the poor, free power is not recommended as the production is costly. Farmers do not want free but continuous power. They are ready to pay for it. Govt. must focus on providing stable livelihoods and continuous power. Instead of cutting entertainment taxes for IPL, govt. can redistribute the revenue from unproductive to productive activities. MNREGA is an excellent scheme to demonstrate the power of stable livelihood in raising the standards of the poor.



The recent auction of the 2G and 3G spectrum and the allegations over it highlights the importance this scarce resource holds for the future. Telecom revolution is heralded as the biggest revolution in the post reforms period which has transformed the face of India. With 65 million connections, India has 5th largest network in the world. Spectrum allocation and usage requires strong and transparent legislation and monitoring. The recent research on using even the 'White Spaces' i.e unused spectrum bandwidth can be a good solution to this jammed resource.



Humans are themselves a very important resource for their nations. India with almost 50% young population can become a super power if it harnesses its demographic dividend well. After telecom its the knowledge revolution which is expected to drive the economies in the future. Education and Health are the most important basic needs to build a strong human capital. Focus should be on imparting knowledge and developing personality instead of just rot learning. Men and Women must be made self reliant and self confident to lead their lives with a strong character. India presently lacks this component of values in its system of education.

Thus, a new thinking and re sourcing is required to meet the growing challenges posed by this limited yet important aspect of our lives. These challenges must be inter linked not viewed from an isolated perspective. A coordinated effort between various ministries as well as between various organs of the democracy i.e Govt., judiciary, civil society and market can create a sustainable environment for India to march ahead into a bright future.



PDS and Reservations

The constitution of India authorizes the state to provide various opportunities to the backward classes in terms of their education, employment, social status and so on. Various govts. over the period of 60 years have sought to implement these provisions. Numerous commissions were set up to look into the operational aspects of these provisions. The basic underlying factor which guided the reports of these commissions was to provide Reservations.


The prime reason for reservations is to provide a level playing field to the different sections of the society. These sections can be classified based on any of the viable criteria like caste, religion, economic status, gender, regions and so on. The census data presents statistics for caste, religion, gender and regions but never has there been a census with an accurate data on the economic status of the citizens.

There are obvious difficulties in collecting the data on economic status compared to the caste, religion or regional data. 92% of the workforce in India is in the unorganised sector which makes it almost impossible to track their economic development. But rich or poor, literate or illiterate, north indian or south indian, all are bound by caste and religion in this country. This makes it a very easy criteria to provide reservations.

In reality, under the veil of reservations the political parties have played vote bank politics. In the name of upliftment they encouraged regionalism and casteism. Yes, there were many beneficiaries of these provisions who have improved their economic status, but even after 60 years of independence, this system has not provided a level playing field for all.

The present state of poverty in India can be attributed to the weak public distribution system (PDS), apart from other important factors like low agricultural productivity, erratic monsoons, lack of access to agricultural credit and lack of proper storage facilities leading to wastage. The way out to strengthen the PDS is have a clear statistics about the BPL and APL beneficiaries so that PDS can be targeted directly to them. Even today, we do not have a clear line drawn for the below poverty line (BPL). There are differences in the findings of Arjun sen gupta committee (72%) and Tendulkar committee (42%) approx.

This seems to be a clear cut strategy of the govt. not to provide the basic rights to the people i.e food security. When the govt. can afford to provide reservations to the poor on the basis of caste and religion, why not then provide food again on the same basis? Why look out for an economic criteria like monthly salary, expenditure on education, food and health which seems to be an impossible basis taking into account the lack of proper statistics?

If economic criteria seems to be the correct way of providing services to the people then why not extend it even to other areas like education, employment, political reservations and so on?

Reservation for the Untouchables !!!

We are a country of paradoxes. As I was studying polity I came across Article 17 of our constitution which speaks of abolishing Untouchability. I realised that practicing untouchability is a punishable offence but the greatest paradox is that practicing caste system is not.While we have abolished untouchability, we have promoted backwardness through reservations for various groups. I fail to understand the difference between the two social stigmas.


Looks like the only difference they make is with their potential vote banks to the power greedy politicians. Unlike untouchability, being in a backward caste has turned out to be of a great advantage. Why can't we abolish even the caste system and have a caste free society?


The irony is that the constitution has become least significant for an ‘Indian’ than for anyone else, after 60 years of India being a republic, because of misinterpretation. 
I am lost pondering over my identity while filling up application forms for various educational institutions and Govt. jobs. Columns like ‘community’ and ‘Gender’ find their places before ‘Nationality’. Is this what the term Equality in Art 14 of the constitution means? 


Today political parties quote, “Our party is a secular party…we give
equal representation to all religious sections of the society.”

Whereas a secular party must quote, “we do not represent any religion,
we have only Indians and we treat all the citizens as Indians and
their problems as ours.” 

Democracy is a utopian idea to an average Indian who does not see himself as a part of policy making in nation building. Sovereignty is lost to the capitalists and mean politicians. 


Today I am seen either as a Marathi or Telugu, as a supporter of Andhra or Telangana. 
I am waiting for the day when I’ll be recognized as an Indian in India.  


Comments are welcome. 

Basics of the basics-part 1

Over the years India has produced many stalwarts in the field of education, medicine and every other field which finds mention in the list of top rated jobs. Unfortunately the basics have been forgotten regarding the basic requirements of a human being. For us to survive on this earth we need drinking water, food, clothes, shelter. In short roti, kapada aur makan. The order of priority is also same.

Approx. 37% of our population (stats by Tendulkar committee 2009) is below poverty line (BPL). 41.2% people are just above poverty line (APL). i.e these APL people live on approx. between Rs 11 to Rs 25/day/person. i.e BPL families live on less than Rs 11/day/person. Arjun sen gupta committee in 2007 reported that 77% of the population spends less than Rs 20/day.

I have not mastered economics but i have a basic idea regarding the needs of a person living in this country amidst the towering prices of the commodities. Having done my own little amateur calculations, I found that     Rs 25/day/person is the approx. value to draw the poverty line for with this amount, an avg. person in India can fulfill all his basic needs (not wants). Thus I find Arjun sen gupta committee's figures more realistic.

Hunger and Illness are body bound rather than status bound. Rich and poor both feel the same hunger and pain.
Govt. has framed various schemes like National rural health mission 2005, Janani suraksha yojana and many more in the health sector and National food security Act 2007, Rashtriya krishi vikas yojana and many in the food sector. But the benefits have reached only a few. The Health insurance scheme seems to be more beneficial to the doctors than the patients.

80% of the ailments in India are due to 5 major factors. Malnutrition, lack of proper sanitation, pollution, stress and lack of clean drinking water. The pvt. sector hospitals concentrate only on profit earning ailments which are not common among the Aam Admi. By privatising the health care, our govt. is shrugging off its responsibility of providing the basic needs to the poor. All it has to do is to provide clean drinking water and proper sanitation.

Countries like Costa Rica, U.K stand as an example for us as to how a govt. can provide basic facilities to its citizens. In Costa Rica working population pays 15% of their salary to the health care. Thus it provides free health care to all its citizens irrespective of their status. Private hospitals in India will not go for prevention activities as they are not profit earning like curative ones.

Food is a very important issue. More on it in the next article.